Author Topic: Analysis of Canadian Fatal Casualties in Afghanistan  (Read 642 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Old Sweat

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 80,310
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,145
Analysis of Canadian Fatal Casualties in Afghanistan
« on: December 21, 2011, 11:10:46 »
This story, which to my unqualified eye is a vote of confidence in our medical system, appears in today's National Post. It is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act.

What killed our soldiers in Afghanistan: Only two deaths preventable, study finds

Tom Blackwell Dec 21, 2011 – 5:00 AM ET | Last Updated: Dec 21, 2011 10:32 AM ET

Some bled to death from massive abdominal wounds, others suffered catastrophic brain injuries and many were thrown about so violently inside bomb-blasted armoured vehicles, their spinal cords were fatally severed.
 
The vast majority of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan never had a chance, concludes a grim but revealing analysis of autopsy reports on many of the deaths, a rare look at information previously kept confidential.
 
Only two of the fatalities examined were considered potentially preventable; the wounded troops might have lived had medics managed to cut holes in their throats to allow them to breath after shrapnel penetrated and blocked airways, said the study.

It is unclear, though, whether combat conditions would have let medics perform a procedure that is challenging even for highly trained doctors, said Col. Homer Tien, an army trauma surgeon.
 
“For a fourth-year surgical resident, a senior surgical resident, it’s a very daunting task to do in a well-lit trauma room,” said Col. Tien, who co-authored the research. “You’re cutting on someone’s throat. There’s a psychological barrier to get across.”
 
On the positive side, the death review underlines that Canadian medics performed extremely well, and injuries that killed routinely in earlier wars are now being effectively treated on the battlefield.
 
About 1,000 American GIs died in the Vietnam War because of bleeding from severed limbs, said Col. Tien, who doubles as head of the trauma unit at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. All Canadian soldiers in the field in Afghanistan carried multiple tourniquets — an age-old tool that had been abandoned until recently.

“Everyone’s got tourniquets, everyone’s very well trained, so they’re slapping them on,” said Col. Tien. “These people with traumatic amputations that would have died previously in conflicts, they’re all surviving.”
 
Meanwhile, a separate study published in the same journal shows that most of the patients operated on at a Canadian-run combat hospital in Kandahar — now the subject of a Canadian TV series — were not NATO troops, but Afghans, many of them civilians.
 
The death study looked at the 73 soldiers killed in Kandahar from January, 2006, to April, 2008, the first two years of the Canadian mission in the southern Afghan province. (Another 95 Canadians have died in Afghanistan.)
 
Most of the troops died from blast injuries — the majority caused by IED explosions and rocket-propelled grenades, the study found. Another six were killed by gunshot wounds and five in road accidents.
 
The researchers obtained autopsy reports on 63 of the soldiers, and believe them to be representative of the overall death toll. The autopsies revealed that 17 died from severe brain injuries and three from spinal cord damage, the latter all blunt-force wounds suffered while inside armoured vehicles that were tossed about by IED explosions.
 
Just over 20 troops bled to death, most from torso wounds. Though the body armour now worn by soldiers repels most gunshots to the abdomen, explosions that erupt from underneath can wreak lethal damage on the torso, said Col. Tien.
 
One soldier who bled out had been injured in the groin area of the thigh, but it appears the entry wound was so small, there is little medics could have done, the study found. It would have been all but impossible, for instance, to apply the blood-clotting powder that was developed after an American soldier died from a similar injury in Somalia, an incident depicted in the book and film Blackhawk Down.
 
The study authors suggest alternative methods to curb hemorrhaging in such injuries, including inserting a urinary catheter — a small tube, essentially — and inflating the attached balloon.
 
Other troops died from decapitation and other “gross mutilation,” airway obstructions, multiple causes and the effects of fire.
 
Those who made it out of the battlefield alive were helicoptered to the so-called role-3 multinational medical unit at Kandahar Air Filed, the trauma centre Canada led from early 2006 to October, 2009, now featured in the Global-TV program Combat Hospital.
 
An analysis of the hospital’s caseload over that period, though, showed that more than 70% of patients were Afghans, a third of them civilians and another third Afghan soldiers and police. And 208 of the surgical patients were detainees captured by NATO troops.
 
The foreign forces made no concerted effort to offer up the unit’s services to the surrounding Afghan population – whose main hospital is a spartan, under-equipped facility – but anyone brought to the base with serious problems was treated, said Col. Tien.
 
For surgeons, work at the hospital involved a challenging array of procedures, from Caesarian sections to brain operations, that no doctor would face in Canada’s highly specialized medical system, he said. Col. Tien recalls a teenage Afghan patient he treated for a subdural haematoma, bleeding on the brain caused by a shrapnel wound, which required him to cut away a part of the skull and drain the blood.
 
“That certainly got my adrenaline going,” he said.

Offline Brihard

  • It's my first day.
  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 29,210
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,265
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: Analysis of Canadian Fatal Casualties in Afghanistan
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2011, 11:38:12 »
Excellent read, thank you very much for posting it. It's nice to see so much of what we're told in combat first aid and on our TCCC course validated like this.

BZ to all the Starlights out there.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Online milnews.ca

  • Directing Staff
  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *
  • 173,145
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 11,691
  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Re: Analysis of Canadian Fatal Casualties in Afghanistan
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2011, 11:57:36 »
Well done to all who helped when it was needed.
Like what you see/read here at Milnet.ca?  Subscribe, and get great swag while helping keep the lights on!

"Healthy discontent is the prelude to progress."  Mahatma Gandhi

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline Old Sweat

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 80,310
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,145
Re: Analysis of Canadian Fatal Casualties in Afghanistan
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2011, 10:21:14 »
The following insightful commentary on the original story is posted on today's National Post website. It is reproduced under the Fiar Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act.

Matt Gurney: Good and bad news for Canada’s fallen warriors

Dec 22, 2011 – 9:30 AM ET | Last Updated: Dec 21, 2011 3:51 PM ET

A major survey of injuries suffered by Canadian soldiers during the war in Afghanistan has been completed. Sixty three autopsy reports for Canadians killed in Afghanistan (a sampling believed to be statistically sufficient to reflect the entire mission) were checked to see what lessons could be learned about battlefield medical care in the Canadian Forces. Though the loss of 63 of our soldiers is tragic, there was good news of a sort — in only two of the cases were the injuries deemed to have been “survivable.” While it’s cold comfort to the loved ones of those we’ve lost, for troops in the field, it at least sends the message that medical care in the military is good enough to all-but guarantee that if you can be saved, you will be saved.
 
Of the 63 deaths studied by the report, most of them were instant, non-survivable wounds. Ten cases involved “gross mutilation,” essentially meaning that the body was torn apart (the category also includes decapitation). Twenty additional cases involved catastrophic brain or spinal injuries. Twenty one of the soldiers bled to death from chest wounds, despite the widespread useage of armour vests.
 
And even the two injuries that were technically survivable really weren’t. A survivable injury in ideal conditions is not necessarily survivable when life-saving medical care must be given in a dark battlefield, outside, while under hostile fire, without advanced diagnostic tools or a support team. In both specific cases, the soldiers had taken shrapnel to their throats, and died of asphyxiation caused by bleeding into the airway. They could only have survived if a medic had been able to expertly cut into their throats and create a clear airway. That wasn’t possible.
 
While the improving medical care for our soldiers is obviously something to celebrate, it does create other problems. Advancements in battlefield medicine and the speed with which a soldier can be evacuated to a proper medical facility, such as the medical facility at Kandahar Airfield or even the full hospital operated by the U.S. military for NATO troops at Landstuhl, Germany, keep soldiers alive even if they have suffered horrific wounds. These wounds can include horrific burns, the loss of multiple limbs, catastrophic disfigurement and severe full-body injuries. It can also mean traumatic brain injuries that leave the soldier requiring constant care.
 
These major injuries would simply have killed the soldier in prior conflicts — the rate of surviving injured soldiers compared to fatalities has been increasingly steadily since the Second World War. That’s welcome news for the families of soldiers, but poses unique challenges to military health-care systems that must adapt to provide long-term, even permanent, care to soldiers with life-altering injuries. Even while Canadian medics were performing heroic deeds in Afghanistan, the health-care system in Canada has struggled to keep up with the surge in devastating war wounds after two generations of peace.
 
For soldiers who live in urban areas (or could relocate easily to them), the quality of care they received was generally good, according to reports conducted by the military. But for soldiers who live in more rural areas, where the nearest hospital might still be a long drive away and probably lacks the specialized tools and personnel necessary to treat battle wounds, getting necessarily physiotherapy or training with prosthetic limbs could mean a long commute, several times a week.
 
The military has moved to correct this, and has also poured resources into diagnosing brain injuries and psychological traumas that would have been overlooked in conflicts past. That’s good news. So is the excellent care our wounded warriors receive in the field. But Canadians must be mindful that supporting the troops will increasingly mean supporting them for the rest of their lives. That will be expensive, but it’s part of the cost of having both a first-class military and a population willing to support deploying it abroad.