Author Topic: Cpl Wilcox court martial - Sydney NS  (Read 45821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline GAP

  • Semper Fi
  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *
  • 129,570
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,831
Cpl Wilcox court martial - Sydney NS
« on: October 25, 2007, 12:24:33 »
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
Last Updated: Thursday, October 25, 2007 | 1:17 PM AT CBC News
 Article Link

An army reservist from Glace Bay, N.S., has been charged with manslaughter in the shooting death of a fellow Canadian soldier in Afghanistan in the spring.

Cpl. Matthew Wilcox is also charged with criminal negligence causing death and negligent performance of duty.

On March 6, Cpl. Kevin Megeney was shot in the chest while in his tent at the Kandahar airbase.

The military called it an accidental shooting, and the Megeney family stated they did not wish to see charges laid against the soldier involved.

There is no word on when Wilcox's military trial will be held.

Wilcox is with the 2nd Battalion, Nova Scotia Highlanders, based at Victoria Park in Sydney.

Megeney, a reservist from Stellarton, N.S., was a member of the 1st Battalion, Nova Scotia Highlanders and had been in Afghanistan since December.
More on link
REMEMBER SOME PEOPLE ARE ALIVE SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO SHOOT THEM

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I´m not so sure about the universe

Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.

Offline bilton090

  • Old man
  • Banned
  • Member
  • *
  • 1,855
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 194
  • AGFN 03-07
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2007, 12:58:04 »
  That's the way it should be !, it's not a accidental shooting, it's a N.D ( Negligent Discharge ), your a soldier and you should know the state of your weapon at all times.
Besides it was on the KAF, no mags on the weapon and no rounds up the spout.
 What makes it worst, is one of us, shooting one of us. ( F**king no way that should have happened ).

           RIP- Cpl Megeney
Chimo!  Airborne

Offline PMedMoe

    is NOT a Med Tech.

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 165,680
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 7,033
  • I am NOT a Med Tech!!
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2007, 13:13:35 »
Besides it was on the KAF, no mags on the weapon

Really?  We had mags on the weapon at all times when I was there (Roto 0 Nov 05-Feb 06).
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.

Offline Technoviking

    GAFF=ZERO.

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 126,986
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,619
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2007, 13:34:14 »
  That's the way it should be !, it's not a accidental shooting, it's a N.D ( Negligent Discharge ), your a soldier and you should know the state of your weapon at all times.

Keeping in mind that the soldier is alleged to have commited an ND, hold off on making judgements. 
(put your helmets on: war story).
We had a GPMG fire off about 16 rounds.  IMMEDIATELY the person on the gun was convicted by consensus, until it was discovered that he was not at fault: it was a faulty sear that caused the run away gun.


Offline geo

  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 24,250
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,604
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2007, 13:35:18 »
From a personal perspective, this is something that Cpl Wilcox is going to have to live with for the rest of his life.

Kudos to the family for declaring that they do not wish the military to prosecute BUT, I agree with Bilton, this has got to be done - regardless of how unpleasant this is to everyone.
Chimo!

I have been turned into a ferret by the resident witch!!
And back again..... what a ride!

Offline bilton090

  • Old man
  • Banned
  • Member
  • *
  • 1,855
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 194
  • AGFN 03-07
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2007, 13:57:37 »
Keeping in mind that the soldier is alleged to have commited an ND, hold off on making judgements. 
(put your helmets on: war story).
We had a GPMG fire off about 16 rounds.  IMMEDIATELY the person on the gun was convicted by consensus, until it was discovered that he was not at fault: it was a faulty sear that caused the run away gun.


  I was over there at the time !!!   DELETED BY MOD

    roto 03/07 no mags on weapons in KAF


Edited by Roy Harding to remove possible persec violation
« Last Edit: October 25, 2007, 14:45:16 by Roy Harding »
Chimo!  Airborne

Offline Technoviking

    GAFF=ZERO.

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 126,986
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,619
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2007, 14:14:07 »

Ok, so to me that sounds as though that should be EVIDENCE at the trial, not fodder for an open-source forum.

Mods: Feel free to delete his post.


Offline GAP

  • Semper Fi
  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *
  • 129,570
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,831
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2007, 14:17:03 »
  I was over there at the time !!!   DELETED BY MOD

    roto 03/07 no mags on weapons in KAF

Did this not happen in Roto 01/07?
« Last Edit: October 25, 2007, 14:44:29 by Roy Harding »
REMEMBER SOME PEOPLE ARE ALIVE SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO SHOOT THEM

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I´m not so sure about the universe

Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.

Offline PMedMoe

    is NOT a Med Tech.

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 165,680
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 7,033
  • I am NOT a Med Tech!!
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2007, 14:20:23 »
Did this not happen in Roto 01/07?

March 6, 2007 whatever Roto that was.
I'm only responsible for what I say, not for what you understand.

Offline GUNS

    ARMY.CA coin is back at FMG.

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 1,690
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 609
  • Are the spades dug-in?
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2007, 14:21:23 »
Very unfortunate for all those concerned.

As was stated earlier, Military Justice has to be uphelded, regardless of how people feel.

When I do right, no one remembers.
When I do wrong, no one forgets.

Offline bilton090

  • Old man
  • Banned
  • Member
  • *
  • 1,855
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 194
  • AGFN 03-07
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2007, 14:22:15 »
Did this not happen in Roto 01/07?
             Mar 07
Chimo!  Airborne

Offline J-Swift

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Full Member
  • *
  • 2,005
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 261
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2007, 15:29:33 »
roto 3, task force 1/07..... the numbers are being thrown out there and hurting my head...
anyway, on a more serious note. I agree that this should be done, but at the same time, Cpl. Wilcox is going to have to live with this forever, and that is quite a burden. Nonetheless RIP  Cpl Kevin Megeney
Ignorance is venemous, and it murders the soul, spreading like a virus running rampant, but out of control

Offline MedTech

  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 17,006
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,070
  • Per Pietas et Virtus
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2007, 15:55:07 »
I shall echo the thoughts and feelings of the many. Like them, I also think we must let justice run its course. Rarely will you find families of the deceased even on civi street wanting to not press charges.the problem with this is that the justice system whether it be civilian or military there must be sufficient evidence prior to proceeding with trial. Obviously there were enough evidence to proceed to trial in this case, guilt or innocence shall be established in the courts, and we shall see then. In the mean time we should ease up on the speculations. Those in the know should also try and refrain from discussing the facts or otherwise about the case.RUMINT has its uses... Sometimes its not too good.

Just my 0.02 Rupees. 
هناك [هس تو] كنت يستعصي طريق
#529 | Rank: 5 | Cbt Exp: 109 | Msns: 42

Offline old medic

  • Medical Forum Moderator
  • Directing Staff
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 24,820
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,619
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #13 on: October 27, 2007, 09:02:10 »
Father of soldier killed by comrade now has closure

Updated Fri. Oct. 26 2007 6:25 PM ET
CTV.ca News Staff
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071025/soldier_father_071026/20071026?hub=Canada

Quote
The father of a Canadian soldier who was accidentally killed by one of his comrades in Afghanistan says it's time to move on.

Cpl. Matthew Wilcox faces charges of manslaughter, criminal negligence causing death and negligent performance of duty in connection with the March 2007 death of Cpl. Kevin Megeney.

A Canadian Forces news release Thursday stated that a National Investigation Service probe found that Megeney was killed by gunfire from a firearm allegedly held by Wilcox.

The two men were friends.

Dexter Megeney, the father of the killed soldier, told CTV's Canada AM the charges provide a form of closure.

"For me personally, I think it's over now, knowing that he's been charged. And that's just me. My wife and daughter feel differently, but for me it's over," he said, speaking from New Glasgow, N.S.

Wilcox, of Glace Bay, N.S. is a reservist in the 2nd Battalion, Nova Scotia Highlanders. Megeney, of Stellarton, N.S., served with the 1st Battalion, Nova Scotia Highlanders.

Megeney said military officials came to his home on Thursday to tell him about the charges. No details have been shared with him about the specifics of the charges, but he said he expects more information to come out during the trial.

Investigators have not said why there was a loaded gun in the tent at the time of Megeney's death.

Megeney said he met Wilcox and his father at his son's grave. It was a difficult encounter.

"Matthew Wilcox was very emotional there and my wife gave him a hug, but I couldn't look at him. I turned my back, it was too early," he said, adding that the past months have been "rough, very hard."

Megeney described his son as polite, giving, and exceptional.

"And he wanted to join the Canadian Forces to make a difference, and he felt like he was making a difference while he was there."

Megeney was the 45th Canadian soldier to die in Afghanistan since 2002. Since his death, another 26 have died.
re-answering vision questions since 2004.

Offline IN HOC SIGNO

  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • -150
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,387
  • Vocatio Ad Servitium
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #14 on: October 27, 2007, 09:40:45 »
Saw Lew MacKenzie on TV being interviewed last night and he was saying the same thing as many here. Military regs must be respected and we must find out if this is negligent use of a weapon and enforce the regulations. My heart goes out to the families of both soldiers whose lives have been severely changed by this incident.

Offline milnews.ca

  • Directing Staff
  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *
  • 173,375
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 11,703
  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #15 on: July 21, 2008, 13:22:01 »
Let's remember folks:

1)  no speculation, please; and
2)  anyone charged with any crime, military of civilian, is to be considered INNOCENT until proven guilty.

Soldier Will Face Charges in Shooting Death
CF news release NR-08.045, 21 Jul 08
Release link - en français (.pdf attached if English link doesn't work)

"OTTAWA –Lieutenant Colonel Bruce MacGregor, the Canadian Forces acting Director of Military Prosecutions (DMP), has preferred charges of Manslaughter, Criminal Negligence Causing Death and Negligently Performing a Military Duty against Corporal Matthew Wilcox in the shooting death of Corporal Ronald Kevin Megeney.

On March 6, 2007, while deployed to Afghanistan, Cpl Megeney was killed in a shooting incident. On October 25, 2007, the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) brought charges against Cpl Wilcox. These charges were then referred to the DMP by the chain of command on December 13, 2007.

The charges of Manslaughter, contrary to Section 236(a) of the Criminal Code and the charge of Criminal Negligence Causing Death, contrary to Section 220(a) of the Criminal Code, are incorporated from Section 130 of the National Defence Act. The charge of Negligent Performance of Duty is contrary to Section 124 of the National Defence Act.

Military prosecutors consider two main issues when deciding whether to prosecute a charge at court martial: whether the evidence is sufficient to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction and whether the public interest requires a prosecution be pursued. They continually reassess these issues as new information about the case becomes available.

The charges were forwarded to the Court Martial Administrator who will convene a General Court Martial at the first available date.

-30-

Notes to editors: The DMP policy on post charge screening is at:
http://www.forces.gc.ca/jag/military_justice/cmps/policy_and_directives/policy3_e.asp. "
Like what you see/read here at Milnet.ca?  Subscribe, and get great swag while helping keep the lights on!

"Healthy discontent is the prelude to progress."  Mahatma Gandhi

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline GAP

  • Semper Fi
  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *
  • 129,570
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,831
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2008, 10:01:22 »
Cpl. faces court martial in comrade's shooting death
Updated Mon. Jul. 21 2008 9:22 PM ET The Canadian Press
 Article Link

OTTAWA -- The military will go ahead with prosecution of a Canadian army corporal facing multiple charges in the March 2007 shooting death of a comrade in Afghanistan.

Cpl. Matthew Wilcox was charged last October with manslaughter, criminal negligence causing death and negligently performing a military duty in the death of Cpl. Kevin Megeney.

The head of military prosecutions decided to proceed after considering whether there was enough evidence for a court martial.

"Military prosecutors consider two main issues when deciding whether to prosecute a charge at court martial: whether the evidence is sufficient to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction and whether the public interest requires a prosecution be pursued," said a statement Monday from the office of Lieutenant Colonel Bruce MacGregor, the Canadian Forces acting Director of Military Prosecutions.

"They continually reassess these issues as new information about the case becomes available."

The charges against Wilcox were "preferred" by MacGregor, a term used when an accused person is forwarded to the next step in the court martial process.

The decision whether to proceed with a trial is a touchy one for the military, as the wrong call could undermine the confidence of Canadians in the military justice system.

Megeney died in his tent March 6, 2007, at the NATO base in Kandahar after what the military called an accidental shooting.

The Defence Department confirmed at the time that the Stellarton, N.S., native was shot in the chest.

In a story written for the magazine Mother Jones, Dr. Kevin Patterson described in excruciating detail the desperate attempts to save Megeney's life after a bullet entered his right chest, just below his armpit.

Patterson said Megeney had no pulse when he was brought into the base hospital at Kandahar.

Megeney's uncle said the family felt for the shooter and his loved ones.

A general court martial will be convened at the first available date
end
REMEMBER SOME PEOPLE ARE ALIVE SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO SHOOT THEM

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I´m not so sure about the universe

Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.

Offline Eye In The Sky

  • Small cog in the big machine.
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 38,440
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,732
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2008, 10:19:40 »
While I believe military justice and discipline is paramount, I can't help but feel for the families of both the soldiers, and the other mbr's of their platoons and Bn's.  Their Pl WO is a close friend of mine, and I remember the look on his face the day of the funeral for Cpl Megeney. 

A necessary process that has to be followed thru. 

RIP Cpl Megeney  :salute:
 :cdn:
If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.

— General James H. Doolittle

Offline ENGINEERS WIFE

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • 4,090
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 333
  • Sarcasm......one of the services offered here.
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #18 on: June 25, 2009, 14:50:17 »
Soldier playing game when comrade was shot: lawyer
Updated Thu. Jun. 25 2009 1:18 PM ET

The Canadian Press

SYDNEY, N.S. -- The lead prosecutor in a case involving a Canadian soldier charged with fatally shooting a fellow reservist in Afghanistan says the death occurred when the accused was playing a game with a loaded weapon.

Lt.-Cmdr. Robert Fetterley made the assertion in his opening statement today to a military panel hearing the court martial of Cpl. Matthew Wilcox of Glace Bay, N.S., who has pleaded not guilty to manslaughter, criminal negligence causing death and negligently performing his military duty.

Fetterley says the prosecution will show Wilcox did not follow proper safety procedures when he carried a loaded 9-millimetre handgun into a tent he shared with Cpl. Kevin Megeney of Stellarton, N.S.

Megeney was killed by a single shot to the chest on March 6, 2007.

It was the first time details of the prosecution's case have emerged in the military courtroom, set up at the Victoria Park Garrison in Sydney.

Fetterley says the evidence will show Wilcox had loaded the weapon with a magazine, while the safety catch was not engaged, before the weapon went off "while playing a game in a tent" in Kandahar.


http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090625/afghan_panel_090625/20090625?hub=TopStories


Mods, please move is not in the right spot.
 
Support Our Troops!!! SOT

If I was getting smart with you, how would you know?

Common sense is not always common.

Beer: Helping white guys dance since 1867!

Stupid is not a crime, so you're free to go!

"Engineers think of how many lives they are saving, not of the one they risk."
MCpl Mark Isfeld

Offline dapaterson

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 127,015
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 6,925
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #19 on: June 25, 2009, 15:23:37 »
Certain preliminary motions have been decided in this case; they can be read online at:

http://www.jmc-cmj.forces.gc.ca/dec/2009/wilcox-ma-eng.asp

One issue rejected was the question of including class A reservists in the available pool from which panel members are selected; this had been previously discussed in R. v Middlemiss and rejected.  (See http://www.jmc-cmj.forces.gc.ca/dec/2009/middlemi-rj-eng.asp for details).  In this case, the judge, Cdr Lamont, deferred to that decision and rejected the appeal.  Which is quite odd, as Col Dutil, the judge in Middlemiss, stated:

Quote
There is certainly serious policy considerations that would strongly militate in favour of including members in Class "A" Reserve Service in the pool of sufficient eligible members, which would enhance the efficiency of the court martial process, in particular in the case where the accused is a member of the Reserve.

Strange how a judge can cite a case as reason for dismissing a challenge, when that case argues against his own conclusion.
« Last Edit: June 25, 2009, 15:27:09 by dapaterson »
This posting made in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 2(b):
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html

Offline dapaterson

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 127,015
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 6,925
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #20 on: June 26, 2009, 16:17:58 »
And things may get even more interesting, from a procedural point of view.  The defence has filed a motion in Federal Court asserting that the court martial is improperly constituted:

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Somnia/1733208/story.html

Quote
Earlier in the day the defence surprised military judge Cmdr. Peter Lamont by informing the court an application had been filed with the Federal Court in Halifax accusing the court martial as being improperly constituted because it does not include non-commissioned officers.
This posting made in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 2(b):
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html

Offline ENGINEERS WIFE

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • 4,090
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 333
  • Sarcasm......one of the services offered here.
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #21 on: June 26, 2009, 21:29:24 »
Soldier apologized to fallen comrade: witness
Updated Fri. Jun. 26 2009 5:48 PM ET

The Canadian Press

SYDNEY, N.S. -- Cpl. Matthew Wilcox held his dying friend in his arms and apologized as Cpl. Kevin Megeney slumped to the floor of their shared tent in Afghanistan, bleeding from a gunshot wound to the chest, a witness told Wilcox's court martial Friday.

Wilcox, a 23-year-old reservist from Glace Bay, N.S., has pleaded not guilty to manslaughter, criminal negligence causing death and negligently performing his military duty in death of Megeney, a 25-year-old reservist from Stellarton, N.S.

The prosecution team, which opened its case Thursday, is trying to prove Wilcox killed Megeney through careless use of a 9-millimetre Browning handgun. But they must first prove that he fired the shot that killed his close friend.

The military court has heard from two witnesses who said the two soldiers were apparently playing a game of quick-draw when Wilcox's gun went off.

On Friday, one of the first people to enter the tent after the shot rang out, Master Cpl. Matthew McKay, described in detail what he saw on the evening of March 6, 2007.

His testimony represents the first eyewitness account relayed in open court.

As well, McKay's recollection of Wilcox's apology is important because the prosecution contends it represents an admission that he fired the gun.

McKay, a slight man with a close crewcut, told the four-member military panel that he was off duty at Kandahar Airfield when he and some comrades heard a gunshot nearby.

"It sounded like a 9-millimetre," he told the court martial, being held in a makeshift courtroom at the garrison in Sydney, N.S. "We had a general idea of where it came from."

At first, he said he thought it was a accidental discharge, but then he heard someone scream: "Oh God! Someone help."

McKay, who now works as a bodyguard with high-ranking officials in Kabul, said he was the second person into the tent as he and others rushed in to see what had happened.

"There was still smoke in the air," he recalled. "You could smell it."

He said he saw Wilcox propping up Megeney on his right side, the wounded man bracing himself with an outstretched arm.

At that point, McKay ran out of tent, grabbed a first aid kit from a tactical vest and returned to help his comrade.

"I was just trying to talk to him, best I could," he testified.

"But he couldn't talk."

McKay was asked if Wilcox said anything.

"Corporal Wilcox said, 'C'mon Kev. C'mon Kev. I'm sorry," McKay testified.

McKay said Megeney stopped breathing and another soldier tried to revive him by using mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

He said he could see blood bubbles coming out of what they thought was the entry wound -- a small hole above Megeney's right nipple.

Another soldier, who identified himself as a "combat lifesaver," entered the tent and took over, checking Megeney's vital signs.

"He just said, `He's got to get to a hospital now or he's not going to make it," said McKay.

They called for a stretcher and lifted Megeney.

"That's when we saw blood on the floor, where he was laying," said McKay.

He said they then ran 200 metres to a nearby medical facility.

McKay said he left Megeney at that point and went back to the tents, where he said he saw Wilcox talking to the section commander.

He was asked to describe Wilcox's demeanour.

"He seemed shocked or overwhelmed by what was happening," McKay said.

At the front of the courtroom, which is usually a military bar, McKay's dramatic account appeared to take its toll on Megeney's parents, Dexter and Karen.

Dexter Megeney usually sits ramrod straight in his chair during the proceedings, but as the graphic details emerged, he leaned forward, put his hands on his knees and stared at the floor. His wife sat motionless, her hand on his leg.

Master Cpl. Kyle Keigan, the first witness at the military trial, said Wilcox told him what happened over drinks in Sydney several months after the shooting.

Keigan testified that Wilcox revealed that the two off-duty soldiers began to play a game of quick-draw in the tent when the weapon went off, but that he didn't know it was loaded.

Fetterly has said the evidence will show Wilcox had loaded the weapon with a magazine and the pistol's safety catch was not engaged when the weapon went off "while playing a game in a tent."

The military prosecutor said all soldiers within the sprawling NATO base are required to unload their weapons into ammunition barrels once they are off duty and inside their tents.

The court has heard this was a mandatory practise, even though soldiers in Wilcox's platoon carried special, UN-issued cards that said they were exempt from the rule.

Fetterly also noted that while soldiers are required to carry an unloaded firearm when they are off duty, the weapon's magazine -- the container that holds the bullets -- must be removed, rendering it incapable of firing.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090626/wilcox_trial_090626/20090626?hub=Canada
Support Our Troops!!! SOT

If I was getting smart with you, how would you know?

Common sense is not always common.

Beer: Helping white guys dance since 1867!

Stupid is not a crime, so you're free to go!

"Engineers think of how many lives they are saving, not of the one they risk."
MCpl Mark Isfeld

Offline Cluett

    meaford...?

  • Member
  • ****
  • 3,040
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 140
Soldier charged in shooting of colleague
« Reply #22 on: June 27, 2009, 08:34:29 »
I know it's been a while...
But RIP...  :piper:

Offline GAP

  • Semper Fi
  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Legend
  • *
  • 129,570
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,831
Cpl Wilcox court martial - Sydney NS
« Reply #23 on: July 24, 2009, 15:13:59 »
Canadian soldier says he shot friend in self-defence
Updated Fri. Jul. 24 2009 2:18 PM ET The Canadian Press
 Article Link

SYDNEY, N.S. -- A soldier accused of shooting and killing a colleague in a tent in Afghanistan over two years ago says he felt his life was threatened by someone when he whirled and fired his weapon.

Cpl. Matthew Wilcox took the stand in his own defence Friday in his manslaughter trial in Sydney, N.S., and told the four military jurors that he heard someone cocking a pistol.

He told a hushed military courtroom that "he just reacted," and turned quickly, drawing his gun from his holster before shooting.

Wilcox says he only realized seconds later that he had shot one of his best friends, Cpl. Kevin Megeney.

"I felt my life was threatened and lethal force was the minimum force needed," said Wilcox.

"There was a weapon pointed at me."

He said he realized it was Megeney two seconds later.

"Only after the recoil of my weapon did I realize it was him," he added.

"Everything happened so quickly, in less than two seconds. I was just reacting to a threat against my life."

Wilcox, 24, of Glace Bay, N.S., pleaded not guilty to charges of manslaughter, criminal negligence causing death, and negligent performance of duty in the death of Megeney, 25, of Stellarton, N.S.

The prosecution has argued that Wilcox was playing a game of "quick draw with Megeney on March 6, 2007. "

Wilcox said in Afghanistan, many people carry weapons, and he regarded any sound of a gun as a potentially deadly threat.

For days afterward, he said he felt shock and emptiness.

Wilcox said when he came back to Canada, deep grief and sadness set in over the death of Megeney.

"He was a really good guy," he said.

"He was probably my closest friend in Afghanistan. ... We lived together for almost a year and saw each other almost every day."

Asked if he believed he was playing a game of "quick draw," where soldiers see who is the quickest to bring the weapon from their holster, he replied firmly, "No."

Wilcox's appearance in his own defence followed 19 days of testimony by 25 witnesses called by the prosecution.

Earlier testimony in the court martial suggested the two reservists were playing "quick draw" in their tent at Kandahar Airfield, when a Browning nine-millimetre pistol went off and hit Megeney in the right side of his chest.
More on link
REMEMBER SOME PEOPLE ARE ALIVE SIMPLY BECAUSE IT IS ILLEGAL TO SHOOT THEM

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I´m not so sure about the universe

Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.

Offline Carcharodon Carcharias

  • Drawing the crabs from Downunder :) WTF is TWL?
  • Banned
  • Milnet.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 29,540
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,281
Cpl Wilcox court martial - Sydney NS
« Reply #24 on: July 24, 2009, 22:36:12 »
I was not there, nor do I know the time of day this happened, but I shared a room in an old delapitated former Republican Guard barracks in Baghdad, with 5 other blokes, and there was all sorts of cocking of weapons an handling of such all the time, night or day, as war is a 24 hr thing.

I am sorry, but I don't by his rather 'lame' excuse for shooting a mate. I am sure there is more to this.

OWDU
"You've never lived until you've almost died; as for our freedom, for those of us who have fought for it, life has a flavour the protected will never know." - Anonymous