Here's something interesting. I've looked up my record in Monitor Mass and I have enough sea days to qualify. However, I figure I've received credit for at least 80 days I didn't earn (I was landed), while at the same time, I have not received credit for at least another 130 days, which I can prove. If the days I wasn't at sea are deducted from the total, my level doesn't change, nor does it change if they are replaced by the days I actually did go to sea. So, I really don't have to do anything as I will receive the badge to which I'm actually entitled regardless.
However, not reporting the overage, while claiming the shortage, will put me over the top for the next level. Other than my own personal integrity, what's to stop me from doing this? Are we expecting individuals to step forward and report that they were not on board for the times in question, even if it means they get knocked down a level or even denied the badge altogether?
One of the prime reasons for not using pay records (i.e. payment of Sea Duty Allowance)to calculate entitlement for the SSI was supposedly that SDA did not actually prove you were at sea for the time in question. However, I have proof that the chosen method has the same flaw. We have an ethical dilemma.
