Author Topic: ISSP - Modular Load Carriage at last  (Read 11213 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online -Skeletor-

  • Mentor
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 33,012
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,713
Re: ISSP - Modular Load Carriage at last
« Reply #50 on: December 11, 2011, 16:56:15 »
A front opening rig is much easier to get into(one of the reasons why I ditched my chest rig after tour and got a TT 2pc MAV)  On tour I wore the HSGI Warlord Chest Rig, and it was awkward getting into at times when fully loaded, but overtime you get used to it and come up with your own system to don it.

Seems like more and more units are getting this SORD Rig,  any reason as to why?  Also seems like it's only the Patricia Battalions(1st and 3rd, I don't believe 2VP has them at this time) getting the TT 2pc MAV and everyone else is getting the SORD.
"We are trained, pushed & tested... In sweat... In blood... 'Till all that is left is Honor, Courage & Commitment to a Brotherhood & a Freedom that no man can take away from us. Through Pain our Strength grows and Battle our Glory rises. Born, Bred for the dogs of War..."

Offline ObedientiaZelum

  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 70,881
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,580
Re: ISSP - Modular Load Carriage at last
« Reply #51 on: December 11, 2011, 17:30:59 »
I read a piece on an American board that talked about how a chest rig like the TT Mav is better for light infantry when patrolling long distances on foot, mountain ops and extended dismounted use over something like this (Well they used vest type rigs for an example).  Figure there is any truth in that?
We ask only to serve
✠ Ave Imperator ✠

Offline Redeye

    Living The Afghan National Army Dream...

  • Milnet.ca Subscriber
  • Milnet.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 41,220
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,569
  • Hope Is Not A Method
    • The Unofficial Website of the Hastings & Prince Edward Regiment
Re: ISSP - Modular Load Carriage at last
« Reply #52 on: December 11, 2011, 17:54:44 »
The training plates fit perfectly. I had them in there before I got a frag vest issued to start getting familiar with the weight. No issue at all.

The back harness has a plate carrier as well. I don't have training plates yet (not gonna ask for them  >:D) so I won't know till I hit theatre if the plates actually fit well in there. The pocket looks fairly flimsy. The dump pouch is basically a nylon bag, nothing fancy and I hope they don't pick it as it will not positively control your mags when they get dumped in there. Something like CPgear's lobster trap design would be better.

As for donning, it took me a while to figure out how to get it on and off easily. Over the head is fine, but taking it off esp. with the frag vest on is dicey. I found out if I lean forward, lift the vest and then uncross the straps over my head, it pops right off over the collar on the vest and doesn't get stuck on the clips from the wings. Haven't had a combat load in it yet, but it sits nicely against the body with the horizontal strap that connects left to right side of the rig on the back, it seems like it would sit under the rear plate, which would prevent the rig from falling forward as the strap would catch on that rear plate pocket. It really needs longer straps for the x-style, it would make it much more manageable to take on and off.

DLR told us the rigs are valued at $550 a piece for the rifleman setup, but I think we should really look at getting pouches from another supplier. The IFAK and shingles are well made, as well as the frag pouches, but there are far better substitutes for everything else, at 40% or more savings.
Palma Non Sine Pulvere - Nothing Worth Having Comes Easily!

Offline DirtyDog

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 9,009
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 596
Re: ISSP - Modular Load Carriage at last
« Reply #53 on: December 11, 2011, 17:56:26 »
I read a piece on an American board that talked about how a chest rig like the TT Mav is better for light infantry when patrolling long distances on foot, mountain ops and extended dismounted use over something like this (Well they used vest type rigs for an example).  Figure there is any truth in that?
From what I can tell, other than the front bib and the lack of splitting in the front (both of which can be had, or not had respectively, with the TT MAV) this is basically the same type of rig as the MAV.

Offline Hurricane

  • Member
  • ****
  • 678
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 126
Re: ISSP - Modular Load Carriage at last
« Reply #54 on: December 11, 2011, 22:32:45 »
A front opening rig is much easier to get into(one of the reasons why I ditched my chest rig after tour and got a TT 2pc MAV)  On tour I wore the HSGI Warlord Chest Rig, and it was awkward getting into at times when fully loaded, but overtime you get used to it and come up with your own system to don it.

Seems like more and more units are getting this SORD Rig,  any reason as to why?  Also seems like it's only the Patricia Battalions(1st and 3rd, I don't believe 2VP has them at this time) getting the TT 2pc MAV and everyone else is getting the SORD.

I would assume that these are trials. We were told that we would be doing some type of debrief with the pros and cons of the SORD Harness mid tour. If theres any truth to that I have no idea.

Offline Lerch

  • The Guns, thank God the Guns!
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • 4,525
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 399
Re: ISSP - Modular Load Carriage at last
« Reply #55 on: December 11, 2011, 22:50:13 »
Seems like more and more units are getting this SORD Rig,  any reason as to why?  Also seems like it's only the Patricia Battalions(1st and 3rd, I don't believe 2VP has them at this time) getting the TT 2pc MAV and everyone else is getting the SORD.

Might be a 1CMBG thing? I know Z Bty has also gotten the TT MAV's with the goody bag of pouches, also saw a couple guys at 2VP using them last time I was in the field.
GNR Scheer, R.