Navy.ca
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Search
Navy.ca's Fallen Comrades

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old


Online Users
612 Guests, 13 Users (2 Hidden)
FSTO, Raffy, Brad Sallows, SupersonicMax, CBH99, Blackadder1916, FJAG, KJK, SeaKingTacco, Inspir, PreparedBroom
Statistics
Total Members: 77,823
Total Posts: 1,516,152
Total Topics: 73,033
Total Categories: 13
Total Boards: 125
Twitter Feed
Recent Topics
[US Military] USS Bonhomme Richard on fire by CloudCover Today at 01:58:30
[Global Politics] The US Presidency 2020 by mick Today at 01:51:06
[British Military] British Military Current Events by FJAG Today at 00:40:25
[Military Literature and Film] Tom Hanks may star as WW2 CO of destroyer in "Greyhound" movie by Colin P Yesterday at 23:18:24
[Canadian Politics] Liberal Minority Government 2019 - ???? by YZT580 Yesterday at 23:17:50
[Navy General] Navy to consider gender-neutral ranks by reverse_engineer Yesterday at 23:11:21
[VAC and other Soldiers' Benefits] VAC wait times by PuckChaser Yesterday at 22:30:56
[Foreign Militaries] Sweden - Sends out leaflets on how to prepare for War. by CBH99 Yesterday at 22:13:52
[Military Literature and Film] What are you listening to/fav type of music by dapaterson Yesterday at 21:33:52
[Recruiting] Getting back in after 3b Release? by Arbeau06 Yesterday at 21:15:58
[The Recruiting Process] Infantry applicant looking to have conversation with someone in combat trades by nathanandrewmeima Yesterday at 20:39:38
[Radio Chatter] The Editorial Cartoons Thread by OceanBonfire Yesterday at 18:33:51
[RMC, CMR, ROTP] 2020 In Service Selection Commissioning Competitions (CFRP, UTPNCM, SCP, CEOTP) by Redforman232 Yesterday at 17:49:49
[The Home Front] Looking for help with BGRS MDI Mortgage Default Insurance by Eye In The Sky Yesterday at 15:46:22
[Ships & Vessels] New Canadian Shipbuilding Strategy by MarkOttawa Yesterday at 14:08:08
Navy.ca Administration

xx Kudos to the Moderators

May 22, 2020, 22:18:09 by Walt
To Our Moderators,

Thank you for the many hours you invest in our forum. Your dedication and assistance in helping Mr. Bobbitt to keep this site alive is very much appreciated. As an aside, to those who frequent ARMY.CA, please consider supporting by either subscribing, or making a donation. Every dollar helps! Thanks!

Walt
3 comments | Write Comment
Navy.ca News

xx Ex DYNAMIC MONGOOSE

June 26, 2020, 15:02:34 by MarkOttawa
Can find nothing official with details of RCN, RCAF participation:

Quote
Submarines Arrive in Iceland for NATO Exercises

The first ships that will participate in NATO’s 2020 Dynamic Mongoose exercises have arrived in Iceland today, and the rest will arrive tomorrow. In addition to Iceland, six NATO member states will be participating in the exercises: the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, and Germany. They are contributing five submarines, five warships, and five submarine search aircraft to the exercise.

The purpose of the Dynamic Mongoose operation is to “exercise submarine warfare and ASW (Anti-submarine Warfare) war-fighting for submarines, ASW surface units and maritime patrol aircrafts in order to conduct sea control or sea denial related naval tasks in preparation for future collective defence and crisis response operations,” according to NATO.

Iceland to Host Exercises Bi-Annually

NATO has held similar exercises annually in Norway since 2012, with the exception of 2017, when they were held in Iceland. It has now been decided that the exercises will be held alternately in Iceland and Norway. Iceland will provide facilities in the security area of Keflavík Airport and the Icelandic Coast Guard will participate in the exercises.

The exercises will take place between June 29 and July 10. The vessels’ arrival has been organised in consultation with Icelandic health authorities and appropriate disease prevention measures have been taken.
https://www.icelandreview.com/politics/submarines-arrive-in-iceland-for-nato-exercises/

Mark
Ottawa
1 comment | Write Comment

xx Royal Australian Navy’s Entire Amphibious Force Operating Together For The First

June 23, 2020, 16:17:05 by LoboCanada
Meanwhile, our older brother is on to bigger things...

Royal Australian Navy’s Entire Amphibious Force Operating Together For The First Time

In a first, all three amphibious vessels of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN), HMAS Canberra, HMAS Choules and HMAS Adelaide, sailed together in formation.

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/06/royal-australian-navys-entire-amphibious-force-operating-together-for-the-first-time/

Quote
This was the first time that the two LHDs and the single LSD of the RAN have operated together at sea. The event occured during a Force Integration Training off the east coast of Australia. The Australian Defence Force is conducting maritime task group training off Australia’s east coast and northern waters ahead of resuming major activities in the second half of the year.
4 comments | Write Comment

xx Time Sensitive Auction For Some Cool Looking Canadian Ship Models

June 13, 2020, 09:53:29 by Bruce Monkhouse
https://ontario.hibid.com/catalog/214737/auction-1/?filter=online

10 hours left in this auction....some very detailed actual Canadian vessels up for grabs.  [I love the helicopter on the Athabascan looking like its taking off]
2 comments | Write Comment

xx Float, Move, Fight

June 11, 2020, 17:38:43 by Underway
Not a bad primer from the MSEO of HMCS Toronto when the ship was on OP REASSURANCE a year ago.  I look forward to the "Fight" video.

Float, Move, Fight Part 1
0 comments | Write Comment

xx Naval Reserve restructuring

May 30, 2020, 19:40:11 by Oldgateboatdriver
Saw this post by FSTO in the Army Reserve Restructuring thread and thought we could expand a bit here on the naval aspect:

Well actually NAVRES pers now have opportunities to sail in all platforms (even subs if a reservist could get qualified) in the RCN.
The original concept of the MCDV's (reserve only ships) damn near destroyed the NRD's. They are still recovering from that decision and some units may never fully recover.

I'll start by disagreeing, a bit, with FSTO. What nearly destroyed the NRD's is not the original concept that the MCDV's were reserve only ship's, it was the Regular Force imposed concept that they all had to be reserve only and all had to be available operationally 24/7/365.

We begin by remembering that the 12 MCDV's replaced an equal number of 12 minor warships: 5 Gate Vessels, the FORT STEELE (class of one) and 6 PB's (the old Bay class minesweepers), of which four at a time were manned by the Reg Force as training vessels and two kept in reserve in rotation, with a fifth one activated for the summer from time to time using reservists.

Let's now look at the Naval Reserve manning before and after the entry in service of the MCDV. We see that the overall number of naval reservist hasn't changed and is more or less the same before and after.

This leads to the obvious question: If the NRD's could barely man six, sometimes seven minor warships during the high availability period of the summer (May to August, inclusively) and then manned only six on week ends only from mid-Sept to mid-Dec and then mid-Jan to mid-Apr, then what on earth made the Reg force believe that the same number of reservists, with the same work/school constraints could man twelve on a permanent basis?

To ask the question is to answer it: It could not be done.

That is why a working group of naval reserve MWV Command Qualified officers put out a service paper proposing that the MCDV's be split 50/50 between the Regular and Reserves. The way the split was to be done, however, was to have the positions onboard the MCDV alternated between Reg and Res during the "high" season of four months.  For instance, one ship would have a Reg CO with a Reserve XO, and a Reg Combat O, reserve NavO, etc. while the next ship would have the reverse. During the low season, the Reg force crews would be brought back together to man three MCDV's on each coast, or possibly four by using a smattering of reservists doing a few weeks stints here and there or doing an exceptional four months or eight months between school programs or for other reasons. The last two MCDV's on each cost would then be used to do NRD's week end training like the old gate vessels did before.

As part of that plan, there was to be an exceptional surge of two years of full manning by NRD personnel at the beginning of the MCDV era, with personnel doing a 6 month to one year tour, the whole in order to build a NRD knowledge base.

Problem is we never got out of that original period, and the result of the ongoing full time manning by reserve was the development of permanent reserve personnel (really, cheap reg force that could not be used anywhere else since they were on reserve contract at a specific MCDV billet) to the exclusion of the NRD personnel who could barely get access.

In my view, it could have been possible to go back to the original proposal of the paper at any time (could still today) but it was never done.

For reason I will develop later, I don't believe the current "reserve on any platform" system is going to help the NRD's either.

Ball is in your camps, gentlemen and Gentlewomen. 
42 comments | Write Comment
Military Quote
The secret of politics? Make a good treaty with Russia.

- Otto Von Bismarck

Viewed 83872 times.
       


» Download the iPhone/iPad Military Quotes app! «


Military Word Of The Day
BMOQ
:
Basic Military Officer Qualification


» Download the iPhone/iPad Military Terms app! «


Today in Military History

July 14



1916:

BATTLE OF BAZENTIN RIDGE, effective dates for battle honour begin (to 17 July 16)




» Download the iPhone/iPad Military History app! «


Advertising
Navy.ca's Supporters

Subscriber Status Board